PetroAiQ unifies subsurface, materials, production chemistry and completions R&D on one knowledge graph — so a recommendation, the evidence behind it, and a compliant dossier all come from the same place. Physics-informed. Standards-native. Built for sovereign deployment with oil & gas majors and national oil companies (NOCs). It's the oil & gas expression of the Innovate-AiQ closed loop.
Decades of subsurface, integrity and chemistry data sit in silos — and the same costly questions get re-answered every field cycle, because nothing compounds. Meanwhile the energy transition adds CCS, hydrogen and new materials to qualify all at once, and sovereign-data mandates rule out most cloud-native tooling.
The disciplined Amplinth loop — Connect, Reason, Recommend, Act, Prove — tuned to oil & gas R&D. Each pass leaves traceable evidence behind, and field outcomes flow back into the graph, so the platform compounds what your organization knows.
Ingest PVT reports, well/log data (LAS, WITSML, DLIS), corrosion tests & standards; read OSDU, PI, CDF, SLB DELFI & Landmark as sources.
An O&G knowledge graph + real physics: PVT/EOS (PR78, SRK, PC-SAFT, CPA) and NORSOK M-506 corrosion models, every claim citing the node behind it. No black box.
Pareto fronts, Bayesian optimization & SHAP narrow CRA selection, chemistry dosage & completion design — bounded by a physics constraint registry before the rig.
Closed qualification loop: request → lab / autoclave → capture → review → expert sign-off, with full chain of custody on an ISO 17025 LIMS.
30–50% fewer qualification trials · modelled; one-click, audit-ready NACE / API / ISO / DNV dossier, edition-pinned.
Every pillar writes to the same knowledge graph, reads from the same physics engines, reuses the same LIMS and exports through the same dossier builder — so insight earned in one workflow leverages across all of them.
PVT/EOS engine (PR78, SRK, PC-SAFT, CPA via CoolProp/teqp) with assay governance & QC: fluid characterization, phase envelopes and flow-assurance screening for wax, asphaltene & hydrate risk. EOR and CO₂-EOR screening with analog-field matching; CCS / CCUS site qualification and injection-well design; hydrogen underground storage screening. Well & log ingestion (LAS, WITSML, DLIS) into a queryable graph.
Sour / CO₂ / H₂ alloy & CRA selection that right-sizes metals for the duty — ending costly over-specification while keeping every choice defensible. Corrosion-rate library (NORSOK M-506, de Waard-Milliams, Sun-Nešić) with confidence bands tied to real residuals; OCTG and equipment qualification copilot; well-integrity threat modelling and CCS-grade cement evaluation; auto-assembled sour-service compliance dossiers.
Formulate from field outcomes, not bottle tests. Chemical formulation workbench with dose-response modelling for scale, corrosion-inhibitor, scavenger and biocide programs; production-chemistry LIMS and flow-assurance risk mapping; compatibility checks; field-trial outcome capture and a chemistry learning loop that compounds across wells; environmental & regulatory compliance assistant.
Engineer fluids, cement and candidates with Bayesian experiment design. Frac-fluid & proppant recommender with conductivity optimization; cement-slurry designer including CCS-grade systems; drilling-fluid rheology and bit-hydraulics modelling; well-candidate and opportunity ranking on the evidence, not intuition — each with provenance defensible to a partner, regulator or audit.
Sour dossiers that took three to five days to compile — and still missed clauses — now assemble themselves from linked evidence. Every API, NACE, ISO and DNV clause is a node, bound to the exact edition in force.
Acceptance criteria live in the graph and link directly to the evidence that satisfies them, so a dossier is the result of a traversal, not a manual hunt. 50+ standards encoded as queryable acceptance criteria across API, NACE/AMPP, ISO and DNV.
If a clause has no satisfying evidence, the dossier flags it rather than papering over the gap. Validation is pinned to the exact edition in force at decision time, and drift detection regenerates the dossier when underlying evidence changes.
A SHA-256 hash-chained audit trail and 7-year WORM retention mean every recommendation can be reconstructed for a regulator years later — exactly as it was made. The longer PetroAiQ runs in an asset, the deeper the graph and the harder it is to displace.
AI accelerates the work without trading away rigor. Models stay inside the physics, and people stay in command of every safety-critical call — autonomy with accountability.
Surrogates speed up simulation, but a constraint registry gates every prediction against thermodynamic feasibility and corrosion-rate limits before it ever reaches an engineer.
Material selection for sour service, OCTG qualification and CCS-well cement always require named-approver sign-off before a compliance dossier is generated.
Every capability must function in an air-gapped deployment. Sovereignty is not a toggle bolted on at the end — it is an architectural commitment from the first migration. That is why oil & gas majors and NOCs can say yes.
Entra ID / OIDC federation; mandatory TOTP + FIDO2/WebAuthn MFA; role-based access with segregation of duties; fully-logged break-glass emergency access.
In-region private cloud or full on-prem, with an air-gapped mode for sensitive reservoir data; local LLM + embeddings; no hard external dependency in the critical path.
PAdES-LTV e-signatures bound to content hash; RFC 3161 trusted timestamps; multi-tenant isolation enforced at the query; champion-challenger model governance.
Arabic RTL across UI labels and generated dossiers, side by side with English, with regional regulations encoded beside API / NACE / ISO — proven where a national oil company's mandates are hardest.
PetroAiQ ports a platform already live in production for industrial R&D, with oil & gas science — PVT/EOS, sour-service materials, production chemistry, completions — layered on top. Value figures below are modelled for a major with $200–500M annual R&D spend; every figure carries its maturity label.
A platform that earns its place in a high-H₂S, sovereign-data environment has nowhere left to hide — every claim has to carry its proof.
Modelled value levers assume a phased rollout across subsurface, materials and chemistry teams. The reference deployment is a production instance of the underlying R&D platform; the operator is shown anonymized as a national oil company (NOC) and is not cleared for public naming. Reference logos and integrations are illustrative; usage rights verified before publication.
Connect PetroAiQ to your PVT, well, corrosion & chemistry data and standards — reading OSDU, PI, CDF, SLB DELFI and Landmark as sources. Customize it to your basins, specs and selection rules — the platform shape is reusable; the domain science is what we tailor. Operate the closed loop in your own cloud or fully air-gapped, where every approved qualification makes the platform smarter. Subsurface IP and well data never leave your control.
Purpose-built for oil & gas R&D — real PVT/EOS physics and corrosion science, not a generic copilot bolted onto your documents. ~80% of the platform is re-used from MetalAiQ, so the proven, hardened core ships day one; only the domain science is new.
Knowledge-graph grounding plus provenance: every recommendation names its model, its training data and a confidence band tied to actual residuals, gated by a physics constraint registry — defensible to a partner, regulator or audit.
Deployed in-region for a national oil company in sovereign, air-gapped mode, on a production-proven R&D loop, with modelled value levers quantified by EVA. Compliance is a feature, not a project.
Bring a real qualification problem from your portfolio. We'll walk it through the loop live — recommendation, the evidence behind it, and a draft NACE / API dossier — in under thirty minutes, on a platform you can run in your own cloud or fully air-gapped.